|
$700 billion in taxpayer dollars to kill small banks
“Like a thief in the night, it cuts like a knife”
-Marty Brown
I was opposed to the
Wall Street bailout from day one.
We were asked to trust the Bush administration, with no track
record for truthfulness, to send $700 billion to Wall Street, not Main Street.
Bush, Paulsen and Wall Street want to stick it to Main Street even
further.
It appears that the $700 billion will be used for Wall
Street banks to take over small banks, in small towns.
Like the one I live in.
The bailout supporters made two arguments. The $700 billion was supposed to stop a
financial meltdown. After we bailed out
Wall Street, it was supposed to open a floodgate of credit for Main Street.
It didn’t come down that way.
The meltdown continued, even after the bailout.
I’m waiting for that cash flow to come roaring into small
towns. Like mine. It hasn’t happened and, according to a stunning
New York Times column by Joe Nocera, the money is not coming soon.
The $700 billion may never see Main Street. Unless you count Wall Street
banks gobbling up Main Street
banks.
Unlike other countries, such as England, the United States did not REQUIRE that
banks taking government bailout money lend it out! Lending is not required, just “encouraged.”
The banks can do what they want with it.
If I was a running a bank, my primary “encouragement” is to
make money for my shareholders. If I
can take government money and use it for something more profitable, I am going
to do it.
Like any businessperson would.
The most profitable thing banks can do is take government
money and buy up another bank. We saw it
happen last week and will see it happen many more times.
It’s what Bush and Paulsen wanted all along. They snuck a provision in the bailout bill
that gave BILLIONS in tax breaks for big banks to buy other banks.
Bush and Paulsen want to reshape the banking industry to
allow only big Wall Street banks to survive. A tax expert, quoted by Nocera, said “It
couldn’t be clearer if they had taken out an ad.”
Nocera, who supported the bailout bill, said that the rationale
that the bailout would make banks start lending again, is “Treasury’s
version of the weapons of mass destruction.”
I feel duped. I feel deceived. I want to vote against a congressman who
supported the bailout, but my congressman saw the bailout’s flaws and voted “no.”
I like small banks. They are an important part of my
business and my life.
Starting in high school, I’ve always had a personal
relationship with my banker. A small
town bank put me in business and another kept me in business. I want to know that the person I’m talking to
is a final decision maker. I don’t want
a committee or a computer in New York
to decide for them.
The gang on Wall Street has lost trillions and put the
nation in economic peril. I don’t want
to do my banking with them.
I’ll take my chances with a banker who knows me, knows my
business and knows my family. It’s
worked so far. I suspect if you surveyed
other Main Street business people (I am actually three doors from Main Street, but
close enough), most would feel the same way.
Small town banks have not been hurt as badly as Wall Street
banks. Most were not playing the sub-prime
game. None of their officers get million
dollars bonuses. And I am sure the
officers don’t get tens of millions to leave when they lose their stockholders’
money.
In other words, they are personally responsible for the
lending decisions they make. Unlike the
people on Wall Street, they can’t screw up and expect a golden parachute at the
end.
I trust the small bank business model more than I trust what
they are doing on Wall Street. I don’t
want Wall Street taking over small town banks.
I don’t want them to use taxpayer money to take the bank and I
especially don’t want the Wall Street banks to get billions in tax credits to
do it.
I want them to lend money to people on Main Street. Someone told me that was what the $700
billion was all about.
People say we can fix it when we get a new President and new
Treasury Secretary. That is three
months. By then dozens of mergers and
takeovers will have taken place.
We need to act now.
Once you allow a bank to be gobble up other banks, just like
when you invade a country, it is almost impossible to undo the damage.
Especially when that damage was based on misleading
information.
Don McNay
is the Chairman of McNay Settlement Group and the author of Son of a Son of a Gambler: Winners, Losers
and What to Do When you Win the Lottery. You can write to him at
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
or read other things he has
written at www.donmcnay.com
|